The first article I read in The New York Times was by Mayim Bialik, an actress who is currently starring in the sitcom “The Big Bang Theory” and the author of “Beyond the Sling”. She also has a Ph.D. in neuroscience. The name of her article is “Attachment Parenting is Feminism”. In her article she defined what attachment parenting is, “an umbrella term” coined by pediatrician William Sears. He described it as a style of parenting that embraces the normal biology of pregnancy, labor, breastfeeding and bonding that ensure raising children who demonstrate the psychological classification of being securely attached. Mayim stated that by definition this type of parenting is not perfect but instead seeks to educate women and families about natural, organic and normal ways our bodies were made and how to maximize the potential for securely attached children. The harmony exists for children with parents who are not afraid to be imperfect.
She states mothers who practice attached parenting are concerned about what hormonal contraceptives do to your body and your brain. Why doctors prescribe birth control to teenagers and adults who don’t have “regular” menstrual cycles. Along with the intervention of Pitocin during labor, the belief that breast milk is biologically and nutritionally superior to formula and that sleeping next to your baby releases positive hormones that facilitates bonding. At the end Mayim asked the question, now tell me how attachment parenting is inconsistent with feminism? How would you answer this question?